Follow Us on Social Media!

Friday, September 15, 2017

Religious Right Takes Bathroom Fight Back to Schools after Defeat at Capitol

by Michael Barajas, staff writer for the Texas Observer. You can reach him on Twitter or at

The linked article above is highly biased in favor of LGBT goals; but if you read between the lines, we're winning a lot of ground.

Here are a few comments:

I don't know what Allan Parker had in mind when he told the Jenner story; but for me, it illustrates the unavoidable fact of biological gender despite the fantasies of transgenderism; i.e., when a trans-woman dies, the corpse that's left is forensically male--- end of story.

The Texas House did NOT "refuse to pass" the Texas "bathroom."  Joe Straus assigned the bill to a committee with a hostile chairman who refused to let the bill come up for a vote.

Joe Straus' "I don't want the suicide of a single Texan on my hand (sic)," is without any scientific evidence and caves in to the emotional blackmail that manipulative people often use. If avoiding suicide is the goal, then NOT giving into the blackmail is clearly the best path since science DOES indicate people who fully "transition" to the opposite gender have a suicide rate 20 times normal.

Bullying of LGBT people is a minuscule portion of the bullying problem in schools, most of which is about body size.  LGBT activists focus on bullying because it allows them to sidestep laws that would otherwise prevent them from introducing students to highly sexualized material put out by the Human Rights Campaign and other bad actors.

The argument that the change in SAISD policies merely brings SAISD in line with the school systems of comparable cities explains and justifies the presence of opponents from outside the District in that the introduction of transgenderism into school policies in one district is a threat to parents and children in all districts.

Barajas' description of Sharon Armke's distress over an instance of transgenderism left out the most important parts, which were (1) the source of the child's desire to be a girl (i.e., feeling unloved as a boy) and (2) how easy it would have been to steer him in the right direction if not for the influence of transgender ideology on the mother. 

All the talk of safety in the article is exquisitely sensitive to a tiny percentage of the school population in flagrant disregard to the safety of a huge percentage of that population.  Ms. Hudgens passed out a two-page listing of actual cases. 

In general, the article uses "LGBT rights" as if such rights actually exist.  They do not.  SAISD and the other districts that have preceded SAISD in adding transgenderism to local policies are establishing a protected class not found in existing law and against the wishes of the majority of Texans.

SAISD, like all public school districts, has a "predatory monopoly" over education within in its boundaries and is using that monopoly to establish policies that would guarantee the collapse of the Districts student population if parents were free to choose where they send their children to school.  

In the end, LGBT activism is not compatible with freedom of speech, religion, association, conscience, commerce, etc., etc.  LGBT ideology is one of the most oppressive influences in all of American life.



A very illuminating article in relationship to the anonymity of gay sex and how lack of sex between gay "spouses" contributes to persistence of the relationship. In other words, gay sex is an individual thing, not a personal thing and that fact illuminates the oddities of gay relationships.
San Antonio Independent School District Board Meeting
11 Sep 2017

For everyone's convenience, here is a 45-minute clip that excerpts all of the testimonies presented at the 11 September San Antonio Independent School District (SAISD) for and against addition of transgenderism to local SAISD policies. You can download it by clicking on the following link, and once the video appears in a browser window, by right clicking on the video image and selecting "save as":

A Conservative Community's Response to San Antonio ISD's Policy Change

Religious Right Takes Bathroom Fight Back to Schools after Defeat at Capitol

After failing to pass a “bathroom bill” at the Legislature, religious-right conservatives target LGBT-inclusive policies at schools.

Allan Parker, Justice Foundation president, speaks to a church in 2015.  YOUTUBE/HTTPS://WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/WATCH?V=SUSSJ-U9CHW
On Monday, Allan Parker stood outside the San Antonio Independent School District’s David G. Burnet Center and asked everyone gathered to imagine Caitlyn Jenner’s dead body. 

Not that Parker wants Jenner dead or anything. But, he clarified, just think of how befuddled police would be by the discovery of her corpse. Parker, a lawyer and president of the San Antonio-based Christian legal advocacy group The Justice Foundation, mused: “Bruce Jenner, who calls himself Caitlyn Jenner, would be identified as a white male in the police report by his DNA. That’s what he is. He is not a woman. He’s a white male dressing as a woman and using a woman’s name.”
What any of that has to do with the San Antonio school district, which conducts its board meetings inside the Burnet Center, underscores the religious-right fears that animated Texas’ recent legislative season.
James Armke (left) drove from Dripping Springs to protest SAISD’s new LGBT-inclusive non-discrimination policy at the district’s September 11, 2017 board meeting.  MICHAEL BARAJAS

Lawmakers this year proposed no fewer than two dozen bills aimed at restricting the rights of LGBT Texans. In June, Governor Greg Abbott signed into law a measurethat critics say allows private, religious-based adoption agencies to turn away LGBT parents. A so-called bathroom bill to police public restroom access for transgender Texans became a defining issue in the Legislature, but with overwhelming opposition from schools, police officials and big business leaders, the more moderate House refused to pass it. As House Speaker Joe Straus told the New Yorker’s Lawrence Wright, “I don’t want the suicide of a single Texan on my hand.” 

Despite, or perhaps because of, that defeat, Parker and other activists are still hunting for bathroom battles. It makes sense they’d look for them in schools. After conservative Christian groups such as Texas Values killed LGBT protections in Houston with the rallying cry “No Men in Women’s Restrooms” in 2015, they zeroed in on schools with trans-inclusive policies. When Fort Worth ISD issues guidelines for faculty on navigating gender issues, Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick demanded that the superintendent resign and called the conflict a “modern day come-and-take-it moment.”
On Monday, Parker and others said they weren’t protesting trans-inclusive bathroom policies but rather six words — “sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression” — that the SAISD board added to its existing non-discrimination and anti-bullying policies last month. Parker called it “a blunt legal instrument to introduce transgenderism to all the children in the district.”
Ruby Polanco, a senior at SAISD’s Young Women’s Leadership Academy, led the charge to update the district’s non-discrimination policy.  MICHAEL BARAJAS
But Ruby Polanco, a senior from the district’s Young Women’s Leadership Academy who led a petition to update the policy, says the change was to protect students, teachers and staff from being bullied or fired because of who they are. She wanted SAISD to conform with other large districts across the state in cities like Houston and Austin, which have for years had LGBT-inclusive policies. Polanco told the board that the other side “pushed fear, lies and their politicized agenda.” 

Patti Radle, president of the SAISD board, began Monday’s meeting by warning everyone that trustees weren’t used to standing-room-only crowds, pleading with them to be respectful at the mic. Then someone tried to shout her down as she explained that the district’s new non-discrimination policy doesn’t affect restroom access. As activists got up to speak, some insisted the new policy was a kind of anti-bathroom bill in disguise that would “allow men in women’s restrooms” across the district. Others waved signs declaring “Our Children Are Not SAISD Property.” It’s unclear if any of them actually have children in the district. (I couldn’t find anyone who did, but one woman says her grandchildren “will be in SAISD” someday.) Some of the protesters told me they didn’t live in San Antonio. 

Like Sharon Armke of Dripping Springs. “I feel like the children are being recruited into the gay community,” she told the Observer. Non-discrimination policies that ensure fair treatment of LGBT students “will lead to brainwashing and child abuse,” she declared. “It will normalize these kinds of ideas and force kids to think it’s OK.” Armke says she got involved with Texas Values when the group descended on Dripping Springs ISD last year after the district started letting a third-grade trans girl use the girls’ bathroom at her school. Tears welled up in Armke’s eyes when she talked about “poor boys who grow their hair out, start wearing a dress, and become fully brainwashed.” 

SAISD isn’t the only Texas school district where Christian conservatives are fighting LGBT-friendly policies. A group calling itself Concerned Parents of Austin claimed a sort-of victory last month when they announced that Austin ISD was doing away with the Human Rights Campaign’s training program for LGBT-inclusive schools, which has already been taught to staff at 24 AISD campuses at last count. Caryl Ayala, an AISD teacher of 11 years, says she quit her job at the district last year because of the training.

“It really normalizes transgenderism and homosexuality,” she told the Observer. The group’s website informs readers about the “sex ed/LGBT agenda” and warns that “the sexual revolution is now entering our preschools and kindergartens.” AISD disputes that its new diversity training, which the district calls All Are Welcome and plans to roll out this spring, is a departure from the Human Rights Campaign curriculum. In an email, AISD spokesperson Tiffany Young called it “an expanded program … with the ultimate goal of providing a safe and inclusive learning environment for all students and families.” 

Ayala and her group still consider it a win, even though they don’t think it goes nearly far enough. Ayala told the Observer she thinks anything that creates a learning environment that “normalizes an LGBT lifestyle” is inappropriate. “You don’t have to be a parent of faith to believe that you should be in charge of what your child learns at school.”
Outside SAISD’s board meeting, Texas Values’ policy analyst, Nicole Hudgens, blamed the raucous display on moderate Republicans in the Texas House. She insisted all of this could have been avoided had the Legislature just given them their bathroom bill. “This could have been stopped by Speaker Straus,” she said. 
Michael Barajas is a staff writer covering civil rights for the Observer. You can reach him on Twitter or at

Friday, September 8, 2017

The LGBTQ Agenda & Comprehensive Sex Ed in Austin ISD

MassResistance Update
Pro-family activism

"In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
- George Orwell
Like us on
Follow us on
Just posted on the MassResistance website:
Includes frightening new material from Freedom of Information Act requests. Parents stand tall, not intimidated by LGBT harassment. See VIDEOS of presentation. (You'll learn a lot!) More
The three presenters taking questions - many from hostile LGBT activists - after the formal presentation. They stood their ground wonderfully!

Help us continue our work!
MassResistance fights to protect parents and families across America and overseas from the radical agendas. We depend on people like you for financial support.
Help us continue our critical work. Donate to MassResistance
Better yet - become a monthly donor (email us to get set up)

Donations can also be mailed to: MassResistance, PO Box 1612, Waltham, MA 02454
ALL donations are confidential. MassResistance does not sell or lend any of its lists.

Contact us if you want to get involved!

For all recent posts see our website.

[If you are on this list by mistake, or do not want to get our email alerts, please accept our apologies. Please call us at MassResistance at 781-890-6001 or email us back with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line, and we'll immediately take you off the list. We've tried to only include people who've contacted us at some point or otherwise indicated they would like to hear from us.] 

Also, if this is being forwarded to you and you want to be on our primary list, sign up for email alerts here!